Scan New England

garys wrote: ↑

21 May 2022 21:44

MSP was using SOPS 1, but I wasn't listening to closely to that. I did hear one arrest about 16:00 or so. Alcohol related, of course.

SOPS1 was for the Revere Beach Patrols, SOPS2 was for the Garth Brooks Concert.

Apparently it was a royal cluster f--k. I have friends in the area who said almost all the side streets were inundated with WAZE lost drivers. Took 2-3 hours to get from the Wrentham 495-Route 1 exit to the stadium at the peak, which is rather unusual. Sounds like lots weren't open early enough and ...

The discussion on the increase in High Speed Chases has been moved to this thread

https://scan-ne.net/sne/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=43101

Please continue it there.

Thanks.

Tornado Warning MEC007-017-220000- /O.NEW.KGYX.TO.W.0001.220521T2331Z-220522T0000Z/ BULLETIN - EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED Tornado Warning National Weather Service Gray ME 731 PM EDT Sat May 21 2022 The National Weather Service in Gray Maine has issued a * Tornado Warning for... Northern Oxford County ...

Here is my comment, and the last comment on this, on this thread.... As both the owner here, and an admin there, I follow a couple of simple rules. 1) I do not copy information from one site to another. 2) Information I put into the DB over there is either a) something I've confirmed myself, or b) s...

All has been added now that it has been submitted.

As Kenny mentions once the data makes it to the RRDB, it will take a week for then Uniden to get it into their next preloaded update. In the mean time , you can always manually add them to your Favorite lists (I think that is what the SDS calls them) The Sentinel Update has the F1 P25 on it. F2 and...

ecps92 wrote: ↑

10 May 2022 16:00

As Kenny mentions once the data makes it to the RRDB, it will take a week for then Uniden to get it into their next preloaded update.

It was added to the RRDB on May 3rd. However the Sentinel DB did not update off of RR last week, so it's not been updated yet.

It's smart, but somewhat unusual in municipal planning to get more sites that you might actually need. Of course if experience shows that the extra sites are needed then they are available. Not if you're doing a simulcast like Quincy is. Especially over a city with such variable terrain and size as...

I seem to remember reading an article that said that they were going to use three sites. Bill might remember or he might have posted the link. It was probably close to two years ago, so anything could have changed. I have the SDS100 locked on to Channel 1 now, so I'll see if it improved since yeste...

I've been trying to receive it from the South Shore as well as from Cambridge with no luck, it's not encrypted is it? Is the signal putting out much power? Thanks for the help. Very likely they're using a 5 site LSM system. Which means: fantastic coverage in the city, and lousy coverage outside of ...

The discussion about old and former calls has moved here!

Out in the beautiful Berkshires, Great Barrington fire still refers to dispatch as "849", a relic of the long expired call sign KCB849. Around here Raynham PD still refers to their dispatch by their call sign.

Based on the scanner feed, most of the operations were on "Conway 2". With Conway 1 (the one that was streamed) being used between the IC and the dispatcher.

I am assuming you heard this on TS1? Would be interesting to find out if TG1003 ever shows up on 151.1900 TS1, which is the only remaining, never IDed group there. I had heard 1003 several years ago when they switched over. Memory is not 100% but perhaps Fire Marshal? I think it was on the 151.1900...

xplorer417 wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2022 21:11

hi all can someone please delete fire 2 453.47500 FD1 from the database because it’s been confirmed it’s pd ch 2 or 3 not fire ch 2 thanks.

We'll fix it. Thanks for the heads up.

ecps92 wrote: ↑

01 May 2022 08:02

Fire uses the NAC of FD1 and this was using FD1 last report for the Fire, where-as PD uses a NAC of E9X

Did they change the NAC ? or might this be a town-wide Shared Channel - common to all ?

No he's correct. Someone incorrectly IDed it.

Do with this as you will, guys - I know I speak for Bill (ecps92) when I say this, but this is an excellent submission! It's very rare a single submission gets a whole section of the wiki added. As you get more details, like talkgroups or the missing site name, feel free to submit them. You can add...

ScanBoston wrote: ↑

28 Apr 2022 19:17

Is W1KNE, KC1UA, N1KUG or any of you wacky guys attending?

I'm going to put in for the days in October, make my first appearance there ever. (Hopefully)

Heard them mention "13th Green" today, so TCC it is!

Having trouble with this one, as I am not able to get a decent bearing on it with the beam, for a few months now. Only ID to help is Coloure Code of 4 no Talkgroups observered nor any audio loggings. Anyone else ? Two questions. 1) What bearing are you getting it at? 2) What's a Coloure? :confused:...

Very broken up comms, but several of them
464.9125 NAC of 464h

From Taunton on the UHF beam. There is some slight UHF enhancement to the north tonight.

Several references to "SG-" and why people were at SG3 versus SG4. SG refers to Scientific Gaming, the electronic tables used at Twin River installed in 2018.

Not enough traffic to make out where or what service is using this Heard while in Waltham on Monday searching for BAA and MANG traffic in other bands. Nothing in the Wiki and too many FCC licenses for Repeaters. Take a listen, North, South, West of Boston see if you can help narrow down this user[s...

garys wrote: ↑

22 Apr 2022 07:21

I'll go with TCC. 14 is likely a reference to the 14th Hole.

That's what I am thinking but will monitor more first before jumping to conclusions. This isn't Radio Reference after all.